Facebook.com Debugger
By
Arif Rahman
—
May 16, 2017
—
Facebook
A few of you might currently learn about the Facebook.com Debugger tool. However, I believed I 'd share it for those who do not. It's a convenient little tool for designers that's been around for some time. However, it can be available inconvenient for everyone.
Ever begin to publish something to your Facebook page and encounter a not-so-great link sneak peek? Often it's missing out on an image when you understand there are numerous on the page. Other times the description bit is old and does not precisely show the present material. Naturally, you can modify the title and description if you click them in the sneak peek, however, if that link then gets shared by your fans-- it reverts to the initial. You might not be getting the sneak peek you anticipate since the information has been cached.
Anybody else has any helpful tools they utilize like this one?
Ever begin to publish something to your Facebook page and encounter a not-so-great link sneak peek? Often it's missing out on an image when you understand there are numerous on the page. Other times the description bit is old and does not precisely show the present material. Naturally, you can modify the title and description if you click them in the sneak peek, however, if that link then gets shared by your fans-- it reverts to the initial. You might not be getting the sneak peek you anticipate since the information has been cached.
Read More Here:Get in the Facebook.com Debugger tool: pop the URL you're having a problem with into the tool and voila!-- The cache is cleared. It will spit out a lot of technical details, however exactly what you appreciate is the cache clear taking place behind the scenes. When you go to publish your link once again, you'll see an upgraded link sneak peek that shows all the existing material. The tool wasn't initially established for this particular function. However, that's ok-- still, serves a terrific function.
Anybody else has any helpful tools they utilize like this one?